Here is another terrifying book that may well make you throw up your hands in the hopelessness of it all. Humanity is polluting itself right out of existence and it seems there is no way to stop ourselves.
But Klein pulls back, just in time, at the very end of the book, to show us that there is a way out, that things can be done and there is a strong grass-roots movement underfoot that can lead us out of our mess.
Klein is a heavy-handed author but she does do her job by injecting some balance into her book. Nothing frustrates me more than an author that will only write about the problems without offering solutions as inspiration to make things better. Klein at least makes an attempt to show us alternatives.
One thing she touched on that caught my attention is the notion that there is a way of life that does not involve capitalism. Post-capitalism, because it's such a new idea that capitalism's replacement has no name and barley a framework. But if you can imagine a society without money, then you can see where this kind of structure could lead us out of our current mindset of resource based extraction economies.
It was one of those moments where an author gave me an entire new avenue of thinking that I find intriguing.
I do recommend the book but, be warned, it can be a bit of a slog.
Naomi Klein's website - http://www.naomiklein.org/main
Showing posts with label Geo Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Geo Politics. Show all posts
Monday, 8 January 2018
Monday, 6 March 2017
Drone Warfare by Medea Benjamin - Book Report #172
This book tied in nicely with The Next 100 Years and Wikileaks.
It was also just as depressing.
Drones, also called UAVs are remotely controlled pilot-less aircraft. For the most part they are used for surveillance and intelligence gathering. But they are becoming more common as hunter-killer, weaponized platforms.
It was a well-researched book and touched many aspects of their development, their use and the effects on the people in the gun sights as well as those pulling the triggers thousands of miles away.
Some of it can be quite horrifying; not only for the targeted but for the innocents that happen to be nearby to a strike. Collateral damage is much more common than we are lead to believe.
But what really strikes the heart cold is how many international laws the use of this technology breaks. The Obama government cared little of the many extra-judicial killings it sanctioned. With seemingly indifferent disregard to sovereign air space and laws of the domestic country it goes about targeting and killing people with impunity. When does protection of domestic security become state sponsored assassination and, in turn, become murder?
The United States used to stand for adherence to the rules of law.
There is no doubt that the people being chased and killed are bad people and need to be stopped. But mistakes are happening and innocent people are being killed through bad or weak intelligence and by the excessive use of force. Missiles are not bullets, they are not as precise and therefore many non-combatants are left killed, injured or maimed by being in proximity of a target.
I found the book to be one-sided. Even though you cannot argue with the research and the facts that were revealed, the author's ultimate goal is to get UAVs banned. The argument being that they are just like land mines, cluster bombs and poison gas; far too many innocent non-combatants are killed by their use. I agree completely. That said, I would like to be allowed the chance to make up my own mind on the subject.
If you're going to report on something let it be balanced. My complaint is more about the construction of the book rather than it's content. But Benjamin is not a reporter.
Google the author and you cannot be surprised that she spends a lot of time promoting activist groups that are campaigning against the use of UAVs. Had she been a reporter these groups would certainly have been written about in a dedicated chapter but it would have been presented as just another aspect of the subject.
Do I recommend the book?
Absolutely.
There are so many details revealed that were surprising and frightening that I am thankful for being made aware of it. The next time I cross a border I will be sure to look up to see what is looking down on me.
Medea Benjamin - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medea_Benjamin
Medea Benjamin co-founded the anti-war group Code Pink: Women for Peace - http://www.codepink.org/
It was also just as depressing.
Drones, also called UAVs are remotely controlled pilot-less aircraft. For the most part they are used for surveillance and intelligence gathering. But they are becoming more common as hunter-killer, weaponized platforms.
It was a well-researched book and touched many aspects of their development, their use and the effects on the people in the gun sights as well as those pulling the triggers thousands of miles away.
Some of it can be quite horrifying; not only for the targeted but for the innocents that happen to be nearby to a strike. Collateral damage is much more common than we are lead to believe.
But what really strikes the heart cold is how many international laws the use of this technology breaks. The Obama government cared little of the many extra-judicial killings it sanctioned. With seemingly indifferent disregard to sovereign air space and laws of the domestic country it goes about targeting and killing people with impunity. When does protection of domestic security become state sponsored assassination and, in turn, become murder?
The United States used to stand for adherence to the rules of law.
There is no doubt that the people being chased and killed are bad people and need to be stopped. But mistakes are happening and innocent people are being killed through bad or weak intelligence and by the excessive use of force. Missiles are not bullets, they are not as precise and therefore many non-combatants are left killed, injured or maimed by being in proximity of a target.
I found the book to be one-sided. Even though you cannot argue with the research and the facts that were revealed, the author's ultimate goal is to get UAVs banned. The argument being that they are just like land mines, cluster bombs and poison gas; far too many innocent non-combatants are killed by their use. I agree completely. That said, I would like to be allowed the chance to make up my own mind on the subject.
If you're going to report on something let it be balanced. My complaint is more about the construction of the book rather than it's content. But Benjamin is not a reporter.
Google the author and you cannot be surprised that she spends a lot of time promoting activist groups that are campaigning against the use of UAVs. Had she been a reporter these groups would certainly have been written about in a dedicated chapter but it would have been presented as just another aspect of the subject.
Do I recommend the book?
Absolutely.
There are so many details revealed that were surprising and frightening that I am thankful for being made aware of it. The next time I cross a border I will be sure to look up to see what is looking down on me.
Medea Benjamin - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medea_Benjamin
Medea Benjamin co-founded the anti-war group Code Pink: Women for Peace - http://www.codepink.org/
![]() |
Medea Benjamin |
Labels:
©2013,
Audio Book,
Drones,
Geo Politics,
Medea Benjamin,
Non-fiction,
Technology,
Warfare
Monday, 13 February 2017
The Next 100 Years by George Friedman - Book Report #169
This was a terrific listen.
Once again Friedman put together a compelling case that predicts the United States will be the dominant political power this century.
Predicting the possible path over the next 10 to 20 years sounded very plausible. Even though the predictions 50 to 100 years out seem too much like fiction, Friedman reminds us that our present day could not be predicted 50 years ago, never mind 100 years ago.
Once again, I found myself getting just a little bit depressed. The power games will continue, the targets will change but the game will not.
It just reminds me that we seem to be a pointless species; we are forever taking advantage of each other. We are not united, we war amongst ourselves and that is unlikely to change.
That's not to say that the book flawed, oh no - we are. Friedman did a terrific job of putting his vast knowledge of geopolitics and took a careful stab at predicting the future.
I recommend the book highly.
George Friedman - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Friedman
Once again Friedman put together a compelling case that predicts the United States will be the dominant political power this century.
Predicting the possible path over the next 10 to 20 years sounded very plausible. Even though the predictions 50 to 100 years out seem too much like fiction, Friedman reminds us that our present day could not be predicted 50 years ago, never mind 100 years ago.
Once again, I found myself getting just a little bit depressed. The power games will continue, the targets will change but the game will not.
It just reminds me that we seem to be a pointless species; we are forever taking advantage of each other. We are not united, we war amongst ourselves and that is unlikely to change.
That's not to say that the book flawed, oh no - we are. Friedman did a terrific job of putting his vast knowledge of geopolitics and took a careful stab at predicting the future.
I recommend the book highly.
George Friedman - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Friedman
Labels:
©2009,
Audio Book,
Geo Politics,
George Friedman,
Non-fiction
Monday, 4 April 2016
The Next Ten Years by George Friedman - Book Report #153
Once again I turned to the Edmonton Public Library's digital offerings and downloaded the unabridged audio book.
I thought I was borrowing a technology book, what I got was an exploration of the geopolitical future of the United States. It was fascinating. I was confused, outraged, saddened, disgusted, curious, amazed and given a glimpse at the overwhelming complexity of power politics.
I am so glad I had the opportunity to listen to this book. At times I was dizzy with information and did not fully understand what I was hearing. But as I went deeper into it, I began to think of the dealings the US has with other countries works much like a game of chess. Politics are not so much about the current move but but what needs to be accomplished four or five moves from now.
Throughout the book the author stresses that the United States is now truly an empire. Even though the US never intended to be one, nor is it comfortable in the role, but that is the position it finds itself in. To that end, the president (whoever it will be) must be prepared to work in such a reality.
I now find myself listening more intently to the international news, trying to see some of the insights the author illustrated in action. This book shifted my understanding of things.
Highly recommended.
Labels:
©2010,
Audio Book,
Book Review,
Geo Politics,
George Friedman,
Non-fiction
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)